An important decision of the Appellate Court in Kragujevac in the employment dispute about the legality of the annex to EA
Doklestic and Partners obtained an important verdict of the Appellate Court in Kragujevac who accepted our arguments and confirmed our pleading – the employer is the one who has the sole authority to decide on its organization of work, and not its employees or the court.
In this employment dispute the employer (defendant) offered to an employee change of the agreed working conditions based on the transfer to another appropriate working position, due to the needs of the process and the organization of work.
Basic Court in Kraljevo has, while deciding on the legality of this annex to the employment agreement in the first instance verdict, taken the view that the reasons for the offer of annex to the employment agreement had to be such to allow the court to assess the justifiability of business decision of an employer to transfer an employee to another appropriate position, irrespective of the fact that the employer has, in accordance with the Labor Law, observed the procedure and terms stipulated by that Law.
Given that in the view of the first-instance court offered (and concluded) annex to the employment agreement did not allow to the court to examine the justification of transfer of the employee to another position, the court annulled the annex as unlawful.
In the appeals procedure against this first-instance judgment, we argued that the first-instance court was authorized only to assess the legality of transfer of the employee to another position, and not the justification and prudency of such business decision of the employer.
We also noted that any acts of third persons, including the court, to impose an obligation for an employer to arrange its business organization in a certain way, to hire one or the other employee, to decide on the work of an employee in one position or the other position, or as in this case, to evaluate whether there is a business need for transfer of an employee to another appropriate position, is a sort of legal violence and usurpation of sovereign rights of the employer. Therefore, the first-instance court had grossly overstepped its legal authority by entering into an assessment of the justification of the business need for a decision on the transfer of an employee, given that the court can only assess the legality of the transfer of an employee to another position, and not the justification (i.e. prudency) of such decision.
Deciding on submitted appeal the Appellate Court in Kragujevac accepted our arguments and found that the court is not authorized to examine the justification and prudency of the employer’s decision concerning the deployment of an employee from one to the other appropriate position, but only the fulfillment of the formal and material legal requirements when making such decision. Also, when explaining the reasons for its judgment, by which it reversed the first instance judgment in favor of the defendant, the Appellate Court in Kragujevac has properly pointed out that also the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia guarantees the freedom of entrepreneurship and the autonomy of employers to organize their work and structure of their employees according to their own needs and in accordance with their business policy, whereby the court is not authorized to evaluate prudency and justification of the business decisions of the employers.